Dili — AI-Powered Compliance Automation

What

Dili is an AI-powered compliance automation platform for federally funded projects in construction, energy, infrastructure, manufacturing, and related built-world sectors. It is positioned as an operating system for prevailing wage, apprenticeship, certified payroll, and project compliance workflows used by developers, EPC contractors, compliance teams, and investors.

The platform combines software automation with service-led options such as full-service monitoring, look-back compliance assessments, ongoing oversight, and training. Its core workflow centers on ingesting payroll data, validating wage and apprenticeship requirements, flagging exceptions, tracking subcontractor compliance, and producing audit-ready reporting to help protect funding and tax credits.

Features

• Automated certified payroll review — Ingests payroll reports from PDF, Excel, and CSV formats, then checks them against prevailing wage requirements to identify underpayments, fringe issues, and other discrepancies.
• Wage determination management — Uses SAM.gov wage data and project attributes such as location, trade, and project type to map and monitor the applicable wage determination.
• Apprenticeship compliance tracking — Tracks apprentice hours, ratio requirements, and certification status to help teams monitor state and federal apprenticeship obligations across subcontractors.
• AI audit engine — Performs line-by-line payroll analysis to detect misclassification, documentation gaps, and other risks, while supporting remediation tracking and prioritization.
• Audit-ready reporting — Generates stakeholder-specific compliance reports with export options and source-backed audit trails for owners, auditors, and finance teams.
• Subcontractor compliance management — Provides dashboards, document collection workflows, reminders, and status visibility across subcontractor payroll submissions and certifications.

Helpful Tips

• Confirm scope before buying — Dili covers prevailing wage, apprenticeship, payroll review, and related reporting well based on the page, but buyers should validate any adjacent requirements or industry-specific edge cases not explicitly described.
• Test with historical payroll data — A look-back assessment can be useful during evaluation because it shows how well the system detects real issues in past submissions rather than only clean sample data.
• Focus on subcontractor adoption — Since the workflow depends on regular payroll uploads and source documentation, implementation success will likely depend on making submission requirements simple for subs.
• Define exception-handling ownership — Automation can reduce manual review time, but teams still need clear internal responsibility for reviewing flagged items, remediation, and owner or auditor communication.
• Check integration depth early — The page mentions ADP, Acumatica, project management sync, and an open API, so buyers should verify whether the specific systems and data fields they rely on are supported in practice.

OpenClaw Skills

Dili could likely work well inside an OpenClaw ecosystem as a compliance intelligence layer for built-world project operations. Based on the page, useful OpenClaw skills or agents could include a certified payroll intake agent, a wage-determination monitoring agent, a subcontractor document chase agent, and an executive reporting agent that summarizes risk across portfolios. If native integration is not already provided, these would be likely workflow automations built through Dili's API and export/reporting capabilities rather than confirmed out-of-the-box connections.

Combined with OpenClaw, Dili could support higher-level workflows for EPCs, developers, lenders, and compliance advisors. Likely use cases include agents that triage payroll exceptions, explain flagged wage issues to project teams, assemble weekly compliance briefings, or route unresolved risks to legal, finance, or field operations. In practice, that combination could move compliance teams away from spreadsheet administration toward portfolio-level oversight, while giving project owners and capital providers a more continuous view of funding-protection risk.